Architecture/research
ClearFloor
A paper-trading research experiment uses finite hypothesis campaigns and failure gates. The reviewed work did not demonstrate an income-producing strategy.
Saved interface concept using synthetic paper-trading values. It illustrates the design direction; it is not a verified runtime capture, brokerage account or performance result.
Inside the project
Give a research idea a fair test—and a stopping point.
- State a hypothesis
- Bound the experiment
- Examine the evidence
- Continue or stop
Where it started
ClearFloor explored whether a structured research desk could turn trading ideas into bounded tests, with explicit assumptions and a reason to reject weak candidates.
What took shape
The v0.9 research direction organized finite hypothesis campaigns, attribution and execution-cost considerations such as spread and slippage. Local packages and dashboard views document the experiment.
What the work revealed
A dashboard, a backtest or an attractive hypothesis is not proof of an income stream. A useful research process must be able to stop when the evidence does not support continuing.
The next step
The reviewed effort was paused. Any renewed experiment would need a specific hypothesis, test budget and acceptance criteria.